Communists are revolutionary socialists. The soldiers, or activists, were to be the “proletariat”, the lower social class. Karl Marx used “proletariat” as a sociological term to refer to the working class. In Marxist theory, the proletariat is that class of society which does not have ownership of the means of production. They are wage-earners.

Saul Alinsky was a critic of a passive and ineffective mainstream liberalism. Saul Alinsky was a social revolutionist in the  spirit of Russian Bolsheviks (faction of the Marxist Social Democratic Labor Party).  Alsinsky also viewed the need to go beyond leftist politics to the point of electrifying mass organizations of "Have-nots" that would rise up and seize power from the "Haves”. Alinsky founded and trained Chicago community organizations to follow his methods, where Barack Obama credits his political beginnings.

The son of radical socialist community organizer Saul Alinsky praises Barack Obama for electrifying the masses, saying Obama learned his lesson well. As the Washington Post reported last year, Obama was hired shortly after graduating from college by a group of Alinsky's disciples to be community organizer.

Even showing her radical and socialist views, in 1969, Hillary Rodham wrote a 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College entitled "There Is Only The Fight…" an analysis of the Alinsky Model. The subject was on the famed radical community organizer Saul Alinsky.

Again, Community Organizer is the euphemism for “Street Marxists”. Whereas Alinsky failed at electrifying the middle class to vote socialism, Obama objective is to change that.

In truth, it is backsliding a failed private enterprise back to its original government bureaucratic creations.. It is a federal taking back its original liberal collectivist creations.

The roots go back to 1866 desegregation after the civil war and with the first civil rights act. Democrat President Andrew Johnson vetoed the bill, saying that blacks were not qualified for United States citizenship. The Republicans in congress overrode the presidential veto on April 9, 1866. The approved act declared that "all persons born in the United were citizens. Citizens were "of every race and color" could make and enforce contracts, sue and be sued, give evidence in court, and inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real estate and personal property

Fannie Mae was founded as a government agency in 1938 as a central part of Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal to provide liquidity to the mortgage market, to collectively spread the risk of bad loans. For the next 30 years, Fannie Mae held a virtual monopoly on the secondary mortgage market in the United States.   The secondary mortgage market is the market for the sale of securities or debt instruments secured by the assessment of mortgage loans. The risk of individual loans is reduced by the collectivist aggregation process. The mortgage lender, commercial banks, or specialized firm group together many loans and sell grouped loans as securities called collateralized mortgage obligations.

Under Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson, came The Fair Housing Act of 1968 (FHA) (42U.S.C.A. §§ 3601-3631) is also known as Title VIII of the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1968. The Senate had 64 Democrats and 36 Republicans. Congress had 247 Democrats and 187 Republicans. Congress passed the act in an effort to impose a comprehensive solution to the problem of unlawful discrimination in housing based on race, color, sex, national origin, or religion. The Fair Housing Act has become a central feature of modern CIVIL RIGHTS enforcement, enabling persons in the protected classes to rent or own residential property in areas that were previously segregated. (desegregation)

In 1968, to remove the federal activity of Fannie Mae from the annual balance sheet of the federal budget, it was converted into a private corporation. To help balance the federal budget, part of Fannie Mae was converted to a private corporation. To provide competition in the secondary mortgage market, and to end Fannie Mae's monopoly, Congress chartered Freddie Mac as a private corporation.

The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) (NYSE: FRE), commonly known as Freddie Mac, was a privately-owned and run government sponsored enterprise (GSE) of the United States federal government. To drive desegregation, Freddie Mac was created to further expand the secondary market for mortgages in the US. Freddie Mac buys risk mortgages on the secondary market, pools them, and sells them as mortgage-backed securities to investors on the open market. This secondary mortgage market increases the supply of money available for mortgages lending and increases the money available for new home purchases.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, provides banks and other financial institutions with fresh money to make new loans. It allows an increasing number of protected class borrowers, often with poor credit, to buy homes. A crisis in the making, an accident waiting to happen, which finally happened.

Just another Washington enterprise, like the post office, social security, medicare, education, and the liberals want Washington to nationalize health care!

Rich is defined by government in terms of single and joint tax filings, not wealth in pension funds. Government looks at tax returns to determine rich. Any joint adjusted income of a husband and wife over $100,000 is rich. Upper middle class and above, per IRS, is RICH.

Let us look to historical facts and actual results of the Bush tax cut “for the rich”, as well as for all. Below is the matrix comparing 2000 to 2006. IRS has not published 2007 data yet. In spite of this tax break for the RICH, they are now paying 20% more in 2006 than in 2000, and paying 75% of the bill. The lower to middle class are paying 22% less. Roughly, 12% of tax payers are paying 75% of the taxes, after going from only paying 65% at end of the Clinton era.. More than a million and a half people have added the ranks of not even having to file because of increase in standard deductions and standard exemptions.

Twenty Presidents went from State governments, bypassing the Federal Legislature, into the Presidency. What were their foreign relations experiences qualifying them as Commander in Chief readiness?  During WWII, what was 7^th ranked Harry Truman’s Commander in Chief and foreign relations pre-experience after 12 years as local judge, 10 years in Federal Legislature, and only a year as VP before Roosevelt died? 

The average time in elected government before becoming President was 15 years, zero years to 39 years.   24% of Presidents had no State and local experiences. 40% had no Federal legislative experiences. 50% had no Federal Executive experiences, no exposure to commander in chief or foreign relations.  6^th ranked Reagan had 8 years State experience, and no Federal experience. 8^th ranked Eisenhower had no elected government experiences. 2^nd ranked Lincoln had 8 years State experience, and 2 years federal legislative experience. Eleven of the top 15 had no Federal executive experience

Woodrow Wilson, with only two years of State government experience, went on to become the 11^th ranked President. Grover Cleveland with only 6 years of State government experience went on to become the 12^th ranked President.  Bill Clinton with only 14 years State government experience became the 22^nd ranked President.  So, history says Senate experience does not equal leadership experience.

Look to Mount Rushmore! There is Washington (solder), Jefferson (2 year Governor), Lincoln (2 year House member), and Teddy Roosevelt (2 year Sec of Navy). 

Of the 43 Presidents, 23 came from State Governorships. Many only after two years. Of our 220 year history, 122 years was lead by ex-governors. Conversely, only 10 years by those going direct from the Senate to the White House, for two died in office.   Only four lawyers spent limited time in the Senate before going direct to the White House (Pierce, Garfield, Harrison, Kennedy). The rest of Presidents coming out of the legislature first did some duty in the executive branch in Secretarial Positions, or in V.P. Positions.

The fact is few spent a lot of time in Washington D.C. before moving up, proving that leadership is not a function of time, or of time spent in D.C. legislatures and legislative committees   The fact is also that most went through Ivy League Law Schools. Twenty one came out of Ivy League law colleges. Nine had no college. Three from military academy’s, and the rest, some college. Most political experiences, time wise, was in State and local governance.

As I have stressed, think leadership not experience, not familiarity.   Throw out that word experience. Discard the concept of practice and ordinary trained talent..   Think and shift the political debate to leadership competency. Legislative bureaucratic proficiency does not equal executive competency. Stop contrasting skilled practicing lawyers in legislative performances to extraordinary leadership competences in critical complex timely decision-making functions.

An IDEAL, synonymous with MODEL, is an IMAGE of excellence to be imitated.   So just what is this perfect MODEL that liberals look to achieve at the expense of past values? What future political actions are really being proposed to make America faultless? The answer must really begin with understanding what an IDEAL really is all about.

An IDEAL, synonymous with MODEL, is an IMAGE of excellence to be imitated. An IDEA exists as a mental image or a fancy in the imagination. It lacks practicality. An idea relates to mental images or impressions, and attempts to conform to faultlessness. IDEALISM is a premise that ultimate reality lies in a realm going beyond experience. The theory that the essential nature of reality lies in consciousness, that only the perceptible is real. REALISM is the faithful copying of nature. Idealism affirms the preeminent value of imagination. 

Be assured, any time you hear the word IDEA or IDEAL expressed in the public debate, and hear about whom is not as intelligent as “WE” , just know you are listening to an impractical free-thinker, to a liberal thinker, to a theoretical, to an academic. You are listening to someone living in the world view of their own head. 

It is Rick Warren of Saddleback Bible-Teaching Church versus evangelical megachurch Pastor Gregory Boyd, Christian Right versus Christian Left, Christ the redeemer versus Christ the liberator, Christian Faith & Grace versus Christian Works (Christian Socialism & Marxist Activism).  I think Boyd's athiestic historical past is creeping through, a form of Marxism in Christian terms, society (government) responsibility trumping individual responsibility. 

As I say, politics is the public debate over the future of our civilization.  This debate over civilization is conservative values (right) versus liberal ideologies (left), where the words CHURCH and RELIGION are painful ideas implying self-discipline. Most Christians cannot distinquish a value from an ideology.  Most do not know if their world view springs from God, from His biblical truths of way and life,  or if their beliefs are a regression from THEIR own intellectually warped world view, from binge eating from the tree of knowledge.

For Gregory Boyd to say that Christian religion has no place in politics is saying values and principles have no place in the public debate. It is saying that politics must be a debate over ideas.  Detrick Bonhoeffer, the German theologen who Hitler put to death, troubled by how the German Christian culture could stand behind Hitler and NAZI's, came to the conclusion that they were non religious Christians.

 Most of the investment into wind power has been by a global corporations out of Spain. Thanks to tax credits here, Spanish Iberdrola is one of several foreign-owned energy companies that have entered the United States wind market. Even coal rich Pennsylvania is working with the Spanish wind-energy company Gamesa Corp.

Let us start with a field of view of the nation’s wind resource maps, available for each state, and how they relate into the power grids. Start by looking at California.    http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/wind_maps.asp

We have 3,000 counties. Most of the counties have marginal and fair wind resource ratings. Over 65% of the people live in 10% of those county, counties with populations greater than 80,000, those non wind zone counties. Over 85% of the people live in half of the States, those non wind zone states. Over 40% live in the coastal areas, those non wind zone areas. 

Wind power does little for Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Denver, Phoenix, Minneapolis, Chicago, Detroit, New York City, Miami, Houston, etc. The best practical solution for the super mega metro areas is putting nuclear in those high population density areas.

Wind power has always been practical in all those rural, remote from the power grid, those small counties with populations from nothing to 80,000, like in South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, Utah, Kansas, Alaska, or New Mexico. That 20% suburb wind resource is not 20% to all the people, but to 20% of the people. These States are already exporters of electrical energy to the likes of California and New York. Red conservative counties already export electrical energy to the liberal blue counties. Prime wind resource state like South Dakota is already an exporter of electricity, without putting wind turbines along the prime resources of the Black Hills.

Another point of view is knowing that the power created at the turbine source has a significant transmission loss by the time it gets to the distant home use. Think of the transmission line as a water hose. The longer the hose, the less the water pressure coming out. The closer to the source, the more efficient and the lower the cost. Most of California is imported energy. . Red conservative counties already export electrical energy to the liberal blue counties.

Then there is the environmental point of view. A 1 GWatt coal or nuclear base load plant needs less than 500 acres. An equivalent 1 GW base load wind power at U.S. average capacity of about 22 percent would require 45,000 acres, plus another 5,000 acres for transmission corridors. Wind turbines the size of the LDS Church Office Building would be required every 240 feet along I-15 and I-80, spanning Utah. Unfortunately at this spacing, the 250-foot-diameter blades of each turbine would intersect each other.

.

It is the microprocessor arithmetic feature that powers the computer not the memory cells full of stored data, not the video disk full of hoarded information. It is the central processing unit that ratio’s, calculates, accounts, and converts information into knowledge, into doing it. Likewise for the fruitless human brain occupied with limited specialized data. Unprocessed information is only unrefined ineffective data.

The liberal institutions of higher education, the scholars, employ their constricted enlightenments to trump the logic and reasoning of wide-ranging scientific deliberations, those seeking truth.  Scholars with PHD’s behind their names believe themselves to be scientists-plus. Scholar, from the word SCHOOL, implies a learned person, and by definition someone who has had advanced training and instruction in a restricted field, able to PERFORM.

Animals can be trained and instructed to do specific tasks. Animals can be clever and cunning, but never ingenious. By definition, scholars are narrow minded to specific fields, and, by behavior scholars are mainly liberal and limited in scope and talents.

Liberalism is irrational. Opinions and assertions are incongruous with observations, logic, and reasoning powers. It is logic that directs the intellectual powers in the investigation of truth, and communicating it to others.   Logic, from logos or reason, is that discipline that deals with the principles and criteria of sound deduction and revelation. Logic is the art of thinking and reasoning justly. Logic is the discipline of the principles of reasoning, a branch of knowledge dealing with relevance, weight, and consequence. Correct thinking implies correct reasoning. 

Liberalism is a mental disease. Deductive reasoning is the power of comprehending, inferring, and thinking in an orderly rational way. Reasoning is the gifted exercise of the intellect, distinct from "THINKING".  Sanity is reasoning, using the sum of intellectual powers. Reason, to ratio, is to calculate, to account, to explain, and to justify. It is to establish the underpinning that sustains a conclusion or explains a fact. It is making some fact intelligible. It is connecting effect to cause and cause to effect. It is seeing the dots, and connecting the dots, that theater of the mind that specialized scholars of letters lack. 

Starting with the Revolutionary War, three out of four of the nations Presidents first served in the military, most during a war, prior to political ambitions.  Many served as generals. Seven non- military presidents were Democrat, four Republican. Six Presidents in a row, from Taft (1909) through Roosevelt (1945), were Commanders in Chief without military experience. One can say that this anti war interval of American history was when the national security (internal and external) was at its weakest. The last non-military president was Bill Clinton, again when the military forces were reduced and American security grossly weakened.  

Before voting for someone, ask when and how they got into politics in the first place. First, give credit and respect to those rare few who are recruited into State and national politics because of some previous great military public service making them respected and well liked, those like Washington, Ulysses Grant, Eisenhower, John Glenn, and now John McCain.

Sound wisdom has insight into observing and deducting raw power hungry people, be it in a classroom, a corporation, or a nation.  The bible is that book, that operators manual about the human machine. For 4,000 years it warns all about this mortal propensity of  "gaining the world and losing the soul!", about blind ambition.

In casting a vote have the insight to see beyond personality into character, into substance.  Beware, because politics is more about personal ambition, about POWER, about human pride and giant egos, about seducing votes. Look at low-middle class Obama, all his movements and positioning over a short span of time, to create an impressive resume, funded by somebody, never in one position to really serve others.  His very conduct defines obsessive worldly ambition, on the move, always passing GO, and COLLECTING!   No time to waste any ambitions or any  youth in any military service!

Imagine the election of 500,000 elected officials to city, county, State, and federal positions.  Two citizens in a thousand pursue and succeed in that career field, in hopes of getting to Washington.  Most that succeed are the biggest frauds, deceivers and cut throats of society. They are masters of image management. They are masters of fake personalities and deception.  Then, imagine what it takes to succeed success in a mere dozen years, and how easy they fool the mediocre citizen with such little effort.

At what point does a failed vision become a delusion, a hallucination, or a nightmare?

Reselling the same failed erroneous beliefs to warped imaginations continue. It started with NEW Harmony under atheistic Robert Owen (1825). To NEW Freedom under Woodrow Wilson (1913). NEW Deal under Roosevelt (1933). NEW Frontier under John F. Kennedy (1961). GREAT Society under Lyndon B. Johnson (1963). Now, NEW Hope under Obama (2008).   At least LBJ did show some creative imagination in word selection.

Liberals advance the nice, and bury the bad and the ugly in a deep hole, edited out from all of history. In America the failed socialist ideology goes back to 1825, before Marxism.   Anti private property, anti marriage, and anti religion in America goes back to 1825, or before. The 160 year old 6^th hand socialist idea just gets recycled under new packages, with the label emphasizing NEW contents! 

In America, when did the pompous wish to convert the civilized world start? Robert Owen (1771-1858), a Welsh social reformer was a founder of socialism and the communalism movement in America. Owen's philosophy, which Karl Marx later named utopian socialism, was derived from three fundamental pillars. First, Owen believed that no one was "responsible for his will and his own actions" because "his whole character is formed independently of himself." Owen firmly believed that people were the product of their environment.   Owen's second pillar was his opposition to religion. Owen felt that all religions were "based on the same absurd imagination" which he said made mankind "a weak, imbecile animal; a furious bigot and fanatic; or a miserable hypocrite." His third pillar said that he disliked the factory system (capitalism), and supported the cottage system (farmers & labor)..

In 1825, Owen took his NEW APPARITION of society to experiment in NEW Harmony, Indiana, U.S.A. After a trial of about two years it failed. All his communities in England failed. Today New Harmony (population 880) has homes and incomes that are 65% of the rest of Indiana. Owen’s “NEW” vision has always failed, in Russia, in China, in Cuba, wherever. The socialistic vision to convert (or revert) the civilized world has never materialized anywhere. Mortal’s behaving as God fail in life, always.

http://www.bopsecrets.org/rexroth/communalism6.htm#15.%20Robert%20Owen